Friday, June 30, 2006
The radio station I listen to now plays spots by Robert Kiyosaki
At least the Harper's Bazaar Britney Spears pics make her dyed black hair look better
Weight Watchers is not a hot business name, but it works
Thursday, June 29, 2006
Jack Kelly on the "Second Hand Smoke" business
The debate over second-hand smoke is over only
for people who are uninterested in evidence, says Michael Fumento:
A New England Journal of Medicine study found that even back in 1975 – when having smoke obnoxiously puffed into your face was ubiquitous in restaurants, cocktail lounges, and transportation lounges – the concentration was equal to merely 0.004 cigarettes an hour. That's not quite the same as smoking two packs a day, is it?
But none of this has the least impact on the various federal, state, and city agencies and organizations like the American Lung Association for a very good reason. They already know they're scientifically wrong. The purpose of the passive smoking campaign has never been to protect non-smokers, but rather to cow smokers into giving up the habit.
tabloid rabies has a good collection of Heather Mills pics
The pregnant Brittany Spears is on the cover of Harper's Bazaar
The Palm Beach Post on Rush Limbaugh
Wednesday, June 28, 2006
Does the Rush Limbaugh Viagra story have any basis, or is it another "Carl Rove sealed indictment"?
Jay Rosen talking to Hugh Hewitt at Radio Blogger
PressThink's Jay Rosen on the Times' decision to weaken our national security.HH: Joined now by Jay Rosen, professor at NYU, where he teaches journalism. He runs the wonderful blog, Pressthink.org. He's a man of the left, but I always enjoy chatting with him. Jay, welcome back. Good to have you.
JR: Thanks, Hugh.
HH: What's your reaction to the New York Times and Los Angeles Times story of Friday?
JR: Well, I was a little surprised by the whole thing, and I certainly felt that the explanations that both papers have given for the judgment call that they made haven't been all that good. I think people like Michael Barone go way too far when they ask why does the Times hate America, and I do think it's too far to talk about prosecuting the paper. But there are some things about what they did that also trouble me.
HH: I just completed an interview this hour with Doyle McManus, Jay Rosen, the Washington bureau chief of the L.A. Times...
JR: Yes.
HH: ...in which he admitted a couple of things. One, that the story could possibly have assisted terrorists in eluding capture and damaged our counter-terrorism. And that two, the press enjoys no exemption from the national security laws. Do you disagree with either of those concessions by Mr. McManus?
JR: Well, is there some chance that the story could have aided terrorists? I suppose I would say that there probably is some chance of that, yeah. And the Times is not exempt from the laws of the country, no.
The Super Hero Test
|
You are a wanderer with
amazing strength.
![]() |





