Monday, July 31, 2006
Paul McCartney beat Heather to the punch with a divorce filing
Jessica Simpson pics
Sunday, July 30, 2006
I consider the vendetta against online gambling to be a bad thing
Personally, I don't care a whit one way or the other about online gambling. But there's a free speech issue crystallizing at the heart of this thing. The verbiage used by politicians is infuriating and discouraging.Rick Day, director of the Washington State Gambling Commission, said most people don't need to worry. The state isn't out to get gambling aficionados who blog about casinos or post tips on how to beat the dealer at blackjack, he said.But he said links or references to online gambling conceivably could spell trouble for Web site owners[emphasis me].
One fellow whose website only reviewed online gambling sites has already shut down. There was never any betting at his site.
We didn't have to look far for more about Qana
Update: A report in YNetNews says that the Qana building that was struck by Israel didn't collapse until eight hours later:
An IDF investigation has found that the building in Qana struck by the Air Force fell around eight hours after being hit by the IDF.
"The attack on the structure in the Qana village took place between midnight and one in the morning. The gap between the timing of the collapse of the building and the time of the strike on it is unclear," Brigadier General Amir Eshel, Head of the Air Force Headquarters told journalists at the Defense Ministry in Tel Aviv, following the incidents at Qana.
A new reason to riot: the Israeli attact in Qana
Amanda Platell, at The Daily Mail, on George Michael
Mel Gibson obviously has a problem
Mel Gibson has issued an apology of sorts. He acknowledges he said "despicable" things to a Sheriff's deputy and that he has been battling alcoholism all his life. [Background here and here.]
Saturday, July 29, 2006
Bill Clinton's new girlfriend? (Belinda Stronach)
Friday, July 28, 2006
Tom Maguire has two pieces about Floyd Landis
Tom wonders if Floyd Landis had passed an earlier doping test. If so, what is the deal on this last one? Tom's second post is about "Dopes at the World Anti-Doping Agency". Tom thinks that the anti-dopers are going to extremes, beyond what makes sense:Tour de France hero Floyd Landis fails the "A" stage of a drug test. The test followed his stunnning win in Stage 17. Groan.
Well, our editorial board has elected to remain in denial until the Sample B results are in and all of Landis' appeals are exhausted. Meanwhile, some points to ponder...
Hmm - why not ban the post-event rub-down? Is the use of Ben-Gay active or passive? Just how actively does one eat broccoli relative to french fries - should we ban nutrition coaches too? The advocates have an answer:
“The fact that we can think of cases that are difficult does not mean we can’t draw lines,” Murray said.
That's an answer? Of course we can draw lines, and of course there will be difficult cases. But if a lot of "difficult cases" represent common, widely accepted, unobjectionable practices that appear to be on the "wrong" side of the line, that ought to be a hint that the line might be in the wrong place.
Eventually the skeptics will win this, mainly because it makes no sense and partly because it will be unenforceable.
Paris Hilton's former buddy, Nicole, is doing Karaoke
My opinion is that we will never see rising wages until we allow some inflation
Marc Cooper quotes a piece about Cynthia McKinney
Thursday, July 27, 2006
John McWhorter on "Making do with table scraps"
The continuing Paul McCartney/Heather Mills story
Wednesday, July 26, 2006
The reality of Colleen Rowley is disappointing, compared to the press releases
Her first mistake was getting into the race without any kind of platform in mind, other than a bad case of BDS. While Democrats burst with enthusiasm, most others wondered why Rowley thought she could go from a non-political job at the FBI to Congress on the strength of a Time Magazine cover. Political careers have been launched on less, though, and those of us in MN-02 watched with curiosity how Rowley would campaign in a strong Republican district. As it turns out, badly. She drove a stake into the heart of her campaign almost immediately by having a photoshopped picture of Kilne in a Nazi uniform placed on her offical website. Kline, who served as an officer in the Marine Corps before his election to Congress, protested vociferously at the slight to himself and to his fellow Marines. She took the picture down off of the website but refused to apologize to Kline. Even before that, Rowley associated herself with the far-Left nutcases that MN-02 residents rightly mistrust. Rowley just missed her chance to join Cindy Sheehan in Crawford last summer to join the anti-Bush circus. Rowley seemed very enthusiastic about her support of Sheehan, at least until Sheehan started falling in love with Hugo Chavez and claimed that the Bush administration was the biggest terrorist organization in the world. Rowley never did address Sheehan's wackier public statements, and has scrubbed Sheehan almost completely from her site. Rowley has turned into an embarrassment for all Minnesotans, and the rational voters of MN-02 has a clear choice in November: support an incumbent who has proven his mettle on the battlefield and in Congress, or vote for a far-Left nutcase that thinks Nazi allegations are amusing and that Cindy Sheehan represents rationality. Given that choice, no wonder Democrats have decided to ignore Rowley.
Tuesday, July 25, 2006
Ann Althouse has several more blog posts about the University of Wisconsin and Kevin Barrett
Ann's final statement on the second blog post is thatTell it straight, and then it will mean something when you back Farrell. I do.Mr. Barrett may not be the person I would hire to teach this course on Islamic culture and religion. But neither would I fire him or prevent him from teaching solely on the basis of his controversial, even bizarre, views. I think Provost Farrell made the right call.May not be? Controversial, even bizarre? Why pull those punches? Barrett is absolutely not the right person to teach this, and his views are idiotic, even evil.
I wish the university administration was not so averse to talking to the citizens about their concerns. It is content to state the justification for the decision, to tell people that they aren't working hard enough to grasp the justification, and to try to deflect attention onto the bad old legislators who want to intrude on the university. This aloofness doesn't help the university's cause. And, ironically, it runs counter to the very enthusiasm for free and open debate that the administration asserts as its reason to retain Barrett.
Monday, July 24, 2006
This I believe: Do what you are good at doing
I listened to Robert Siegel take Ned Lamont apart on ATC on the way home
Paris Hilton Pics
Sunday, July 23, 2006
Marc Cooper is pretty violently against the use of military force
I have been quite discouraged by the dialogue of the deaf that has taken place on this blog and elsewhere as the war in Lebanon deepens.Too many people around here are way too ready to sit back and watch others die in the name of some very simplistic formulas. There's a facile reductionism at play when one "reasons" that because Hezbollah has attacked Israel, Israel is now licensed to retaliate in any form it desires -- and to hell with the consequences. This same line of logic argues that to criticize Israel, to raise any question around its strategy, to be concerned at any level about the long-term effects of its current campaign, to voice any worry about the way the U.S. responds to the crisis, is to appease or even condone terrorism.
What a stinking load of bull. And very dangerous bull. Warfare is not about keeping score, or getting even. It's about the lives and deaths of real people. And thought it's a cliche, most of them are just like me and you. War should never be a question of what is justified. But rather what is the minimum amount of violence absolutely necessary to achieve whatever that "just" goal might be. Does Hezbollah have a right to camp out in Lebanon and hurl missiles at Israel? Of course not. Hezbollah must be rolled back and disarmed, but not by flattening Lebanon and enflaming the entire Arab world.
Likewise, one might ask: Do Israelis have the right to continue occupying Palestinian territory that -- frankly-- just doesn't belong to them? Does Israel have the right to continue an occupation that deprives Palestinians of their sovereignty, their dignity and their equal rights? Of course not. A two-state solution must be reached and the Israeli domination of the Palestinians must come to an end, but not by supporting Palestinian suicide bombers nor any other atrocity committed against the Israeli civilian population. I'm sorry to be so blunt, but only a fool -- yes, a fool-- would watch unperturbed as match after match is tossed into the sea of gasoline that is the Middle East. If Israel's retaliation, which now includes wholesale bombardment of Lebanese cities driving hundreds of thousands from their homes, morphs into a wide, regional war will anyone be consoled ten years from now by standing on the smoking ruins and simply saying, "Oh well, you know, the Hezbollah are the ones who started it."
More of Ann Althouse on the Kevin Barrett situation
Fish writes:It is part of a teacher’s job to set personal conviction aside for the hour or two when a class is in session and allow the techniques and protocols of academic research full sway.This restraint should not be too difficult to exercise. After all, we require and expect it of judges, referees and reporters. And while its exercise may not always be total, it is both important and possible to make the effort.
It seems to me that the first question to ask is: have we jettisoned this idea(l)? It seems that we have in certain arenas but not others. Your comment about law profs is telling precisely because lawyers are one of the few areas of endeavor left where we choose to believe that the advocate need not actually believe in the cause or the the client. So in the domain of law we think that personal politics will not automatically win out (well, that was the theory, at any rate). But if we have lost that everywhere else it will be a tragedy for society. So I suppose the question is: do we really want to act as if it's impossible for anyone to have a space between personal beliefs and public acts?
Some thoughts about the Weight Watchers Core Plan
Saturday, July 22, 2006
This was a revelation to me: the 7.5pt font in Word (!)
Radio Blogger: Mark Steyn on Hugh Hewitt, last Thursday
HH: I begin, as I do every single Thursday that he's available, with columnist to the world, Mark Steyn. Mark Steyn, your assessment of the war against Israel, a week into it?
MS: Well, I think the interesting feature so far, really, is the poodles that didn't yap, to pacify Sherlock Holmes. Normally, by this stage, the public rhetoric of the Europeans and the Arabs would be ferocious. And instead, I think both of them have been very circumspect in public. And certainly, the ones I've talked to in private are in fact, in a strange way, and possibly unprecedented, at least in the last thirty years, they're rooting for Israel. Amazing.
HH: Why is that?
MS: Well, I think because they have actually seen that...they've had a tremendous glimpse of their own future, and what has happened to Gaza, and what has happened in Southern Lebanon, and to Lebanon as a whole, and in effect, even to Syria, because Syria is, in fact, playing Mini Me to Iran's Dr. Evil at the moment, and that they've seen a terrible portent to where things could go, both for Jordan, for Egypt, for Saudi Arabia, and down the line, for certain European countries, too.
Razib has a piece about possible human interbreeding with Neanderthals, which Razib argues was possible
A clear and resounding objection to this is that humans and Neandertals were not interfertile. The reality is that the separation of the two populations was only 500,000 years BP, so it is almost certainly not true, tigers and lions are interfertile and they have been distinct for 2 million years. Another objection is that Neandertals looked too different. Again, the Watusi have had Twa (pygmy) queens, resulting in the matrimony of the tallest and shortest of human populations. Neandertals were distinctive looking, but I am skeptical that they were alien enough that one could never conceive of copulation with them. Additionally, we know humans have sex with animals all the time, or at least frequently enough that the dynamic I allude to above could result in allleles jumping populations.
Finally, what's the payoff here, are there candidates for genes that could have jumped? Yes, there are, and one is mentioned in the article, at least implicitly, MC1R, which plays some role in melanin production. In Europeans this locus is extremely polymorphic, that is, it has a lot of diversity. This requires explaining, and some authors have posited negative frequency dependent selection, where low frequency traits hang around in the population because they are beneficial, but if they become too frequent they will be selected against. I won't hit on this, but address the issue for why this is introduced in the first place: the coalescence, the common ancestors, for many of the MC1R alleles in Europe are very deep, and some have estimated that the level of extant diversity would require 800,000 years to accumulate via neutral non-selective processes. What does this have to do with bumping Neandertal uglies? Neandertals separated from our own lineage 500,000 years ago, and emerged from archaic populations that have lived in Europe for as long as a million years. In other words, Neandertals had enough "time" to build up neutral alternative allelic variants which confered a selective advantange vis-a-vis new arrivals. What might have happened was simply that dark skinned Africans arrived on the scene, replaced the native Neandertals, but managed to pick up extremely beneficial locally adapted alleles for coloration from the predecessor population, who obviously had a long time to be optimized toward the local climatic regime.
9/11 Denial
The Capital Times on Kevin Barrett
BareknucklePolitics on Barrett
U.W.-Madison Provost Pat Farrell launched a review after Barrett spoke last month on a talk show about his views that the terrorist attacks were the result of a government conspiracy to spark war in the Middle East. After the review, Farrell said Barrett was a qualified instructor who can present his views as one perspective on the attacks.
Barrett has said he thinks the most likely theory about the 9/11 plot is that it was an "inside job" organized and commanded by Vice President Dick Cheney.
"I still have every expectation this will be a very positive educational experience for our students," Farrell said Thursday. "Some are upset about Mr. Barrett's viewpoints on 9/11 and don’t want to pay much attention to what makes for a quality educational experience."
This is Ann Althouse's post on Barrett and the University of Wisconsin
Meanwhile:Sixty-one state lawmakers sent a letter Thursday calling on University of Wisconsin-Madison to fire [Barrett]. The letter signed by 52 Assembly representatives and nine state senators, including Republican leaders, condemns a decision earlier this month by UW-Madison Provost Pat Farrell allowing Kevin Barrett to teach an introductory class this fall on Islam. Rep. Steve Nass, R-Whitewater, said the letter, which called Barrett's views "academically dishonest," sent a strong message to top UW leaders.... The lawmakers sent the letter to the governor, university leaders and Barrett instead of approving a formal resolution offered by Nass during the last day of their session last week. Republicans did not take up the resolution, saying it was not the right day for political bickering.Oh, yeah, it's all just politics. Sorry, forget it. Nobody actually cares about students and education in any kind of a principled way. Now, go. Get out of here. Go pay attention to some damned thing.
The "Barrett Story" at the University of Wisconsin
Celebs and the Mickey Mouse Club
Friday, July 21, 2006
Lebanon
Thursday, July 20, 2006
The Sun show that Heather Mills is no longer wearing her rings
Joe Lieberman
Joe-Mentum apears to have failed the former Democratic VP candidate in his upcoming primary. Ned Lamont has cruised into the lead despite worries over his single-issue campaign according to a new Quinnipiac poll, 51-47:Anti-war Connecticut U.S. Senate candidate Ned Lamont has surged to a razor-thin 51 - 47 percent lead over incumbent Sen. Joseph Lieberman among likely Democratic primary voters, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today. This compares to a 55 - 40 percent lead for Sen. Lieberman among likely Democratic primary voters in a June 8 poll by the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University. ...
Wednesday, July 19, 2006
Some think the Hezbollah wants a negotiated settlement
One Cosmos comments on (among other things) Heather Mills's appearance with Larry King
"Aside from Larry's closing tribute to Red Buttons, I've never heard more rubbish in a single hour since . . . well, come to think of it, since the last time I saw "Larry King Live." But at least that was a special with Heather Mills (Paul McCartney's missus), with which subject Larry seemed rather more engaged, at least after Lady McCartney plunked her artificial leg up on the desk and invited Larry to feel its lifelike texture, which is more than one can say for Larry these days.
Celeb World's coverage of Heather Mills
Tuesday, July 18, 2006
This morning, Ernie Brown had a revelation about TWA Flight 800
So you like to read about Britney Spears in the grocery store?
Monday, July 17, 2006
Walrus Gumboot says that Paul McCartney means business: he hired Prince Charles' divorce lawyer
The Globe and Mail and Lebanon
Sunday, July 16, 2006
Paul McCartney's tapped phone conversations are still "out there" as an issue
More grocery store tabloid fodder: Katie Holmes and Tom Cruise
Saturday, July 15, 2006
If you want weird, how about Katie Holmes and the ultimate weirdness, Tom Cruise?
Tabloid Rabies sure has the stuff on Heather Mills
How about Paul McCartney's "moving on" party?
Friday, July 14, 2006
So Heather Mills thinks that a PR blitz will help?
I would like to see Israel attacking Hezbollah, not Lebanon
Anthony Shadid analyzes the Hezbollah attack on Israel and its capture of two IDF soldiers, and concludes that it just shot itself in the foot. Their unilateral decision to engage Israel militarily has probably done as much damage to Hezbollah in Lebanese politics as the assassination of Rafik Hariri did to the Syrian occupation...
Thursday, July 13, 2006
People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones
As has a Lindsey Lohan video that is "not worksafe"
An Iranian Friend Blames the Present Situation on Zbigniew Brzezinski and Carter
Marc Cooper on the war in the Middle East
We interrupt the solemn debate over Glenn Greenwald and Glenn Reynolds to bring you a snatch of news from the real world: With Israel now mounting an invasion of southern Lebanon and with Washington and Tel Aviv blaming Syria (and Iran) for the latest killing and kidnapping of Israeli soldiers, we are that much closer to all-out regional war.
[Update: The Israeli Air Force has already bombed the Beirut airport.]
What fine timing Hezbollah chose to esacalate matters, playing right into the hands of an Israeli government already heady in the fog of war. An emergency meeting of the Arab League has been called in an attempt to head off a wider conflagration but the fighting is only escalating.
Israel, Lebanon, and Gaza
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
What is the diffference between The Daily Kos and Ann Coulter?
MICKEY KAUS: "Kos explicitly endorses 'the 2nd Amendment and the right to bear arms.'"
Looks like my long-term plan to win him over is working!
Razib, at Gene Expression, has a good piece called "Death to Heretics"
So what do you do with memes that are pernicious? Why memetic warfare of course! The hysterics emenating from places like Jihad Watch are entirely appropriate here in my opinion, the witch has blasphemed, and her kind should be excised from decent society. Her kind includes all those who refuse to bow to the No-god of freedom of conscience. But the attack must be multi-pronged. From below the foot soldiers may scream and engage in their human wave attacks, but they need air support, and the modern West has a deep well of anti-religious polemic from which it can draw from here. If we unbelievers are to protect our sacred right to unbelief, we must not shirk our duty to engage in proper and pious contempt, condescension and critique at what is clearly savage and unrepentantly primal superstition of a gross sort, idolatry scaffolded in the garb of high culture. Let us bring the precision guided bombs and simply eviscerate them from on high. We have the swords on hand now, and we are no longer blind, we are the gods of our own future history.
I would say that Britney has problems, and must be in denial
Tuesday, July 11, 2006
There were bombings in Kashmir, as well
Gateway Pundit has some video and good stuff on the bombings in Mumbai (Bombay)
Bombings in Mumbai (Bombay)
Monday, July 10, 2006
On Science Blogs writes about Neanderthal DNA
Dieting
More weirdness: Heather Mills is back on Paul McCartney's estate
Sunday, July 09, 2006
"As the world turns": more flap surrounding Heather Mills
Saturday, July 08, 2006
I continue to be a PhD Comics ("Piled Higher and Deeper) addict
As you can see, we are keeping the discussion on a high plane (not)
Another nice Britney Spears fake pic
SocialiteLife has a Cameron Diaz pic
Friday, July 07, 2006
One reason to think that the Amsterdam at Scheveningen was not the new 50 gun ship
This is why I do not use Tylenol
Tom Elia on Ken Lay and the Huffington Post
Whacko, Moonbat Conspiracy Theorizin' at HuffPo
At the Huffington Post, David Goldstein has a post titled, "Did President Bush Have Ken Lay Murdered?"
The comments section is filled with the wisdom one might expect from the readers of that august enterprise:-- I'm not convinced the guy is dead. It's not out of the realm of possibility that he may have gone "underground" as a retribute for being a loyal Ranger (multi-million $ GOP fundraiser) and dedicated Shrub-Acolyte.
Kenny Boy's probably sipping mimosa's on some beach in Bali right about now, or in post-op recovery from major plastic surgery to alter his appearance.
Candid pics of an unpregnant Britney Spears
Paul Graham says only "Copy What You Like"
That was one of the most valuable things I learned from painting: you have to figure out for yourself what's good. You can't trust authorities. They'll lie to you on this one.
North Korea is the classic "Failed State"
Judea Pearl at Atlas Shrugs
Pamela, at Atlas Shrugs, has a long post about Judea Pearl and Andrew Bostom. You may or may not remember that Judea Pearl is the father of the late Daniel Pearl. I am most familiar with the work of Judea Pearl. He wrote a classic book on Bayesian networks for reasoning, back in the 1980's. We used the technology in a DARPA-funded program that combined AI and image processing.
The name of Pamela's blog suggests that she might be an Objectivist. I take it that she is also Jewish. She starts:
Not sure how many of you have been following the slugfest between Judea Pearl (Daniel Pearl's father) and Andrew Bostom in the cyberpages of FrontPage magazine but it is an interesting intellectual bout between those that believe that Islamic societies are in urgent need of reform (Bostom, Sultan, Ayaan irsi Ali) and those that believe the violent Jihad that the Koran glorifies is merely aggressive verses of the sort that should be interpreted in a narrow local context, applicable to a specific period or specific battle in the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Pearl, Pipes, most Muslim apologists).
Judea Pearl writes in the pages of FrontPage Magazine, The Future of Islam
Thursday, July 06, 2006
By the way, I used Monster.com to find a job
Kevin Drum on The One Percent Doctrine
The single most defining characteristic of George Bush's personality is his belief in his own instinct and his corresponding disdain for serious policy analysis. For Bush, the One Percent Doctrine is tailor made. He is contemptuous of policy discussions, and the OPD is the perfect excuse to ignore them.Kevin's punch line is that
But bewarned: if you take the threat of Islamic jihadism seriously, Suskind will not make you feel any safer. Quite the contrary. As Richard Dearlove said yesterday, "just about everything in the American approach to the war on Islamic terrorism had been ill-conceived." Suskind gives you a pretty good idea of why.If you believe Ron Suskind, as Kevin does, then we were just lucky to not have been hit again, as the Bush administration is strange, unthinking, incompetent, and a bit evil. Kevin says that the One Percent Doctrine was appropriate for September 12, 2001, but not for September 12, 2002 and beyond. Kevin charges that Bush and Cheney are using the One Percent Doctrine as a excuse to cut corners and do what he considers to be "bad things", while being ineffective in combating terrorism. My take is that Ron Suskind is just mouthing paranoia, and a general mailaise on the the Left that has only increased over time, as they seem to have become more and more adrift.
Britney Spears pics at GoBritney.com
Software consulting seems to be recovering, at least in Dallas
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
The Palm Beach Post says that Rush Limbaugh will not be charged over the Viagra found in his possession
This appears to be a fake bodypaint job
Tuesday, July 04, 2006
Paul Graham has a new essay: "The Island Test"
I've discovered a handy test for figuring out what you're addicted to. Imagine you were going to spend the weekend at a friend's house on a little island off the coast of Maine. There are no shops on the island and you won't be able to leave while you're there. Also, you've never been to this house before, so you can't assume it will have more than any house might.
Victoria Newton, at The Sun, on Heather Mills
A series of ongoing story lines
- The Bush administration is incompetent
- The Bush administration, and especially Dick Cheney, is evil
- We caused the trouble in Iraq by attacking, to further some Bush family agenda
- Our insensitivity causes hatred in the Muslim world
- Israel controls our foreign policy and is a major source of evil in the world
- The Bush administration is largely controlled by business interests
- Global Warming is a great threat, and created by our lifestyle
Monday, July 03, 2006
I guess that this means that Duane Patterson doesn't like Bill Keller
Keller's defense has been thoroughly fisked by Hugh and many others, and there's very little he could say that would undo the clear implications you have to make regarding his recent editorial decisions. Here's what you have to deduce, especially after the here's where they all live, and the stores they shop at story:
1. Keller has no fear or respect of either this administration or Congress.
2. Keller has no fear or repect of the Islamo-facists we are fighting in the War On Terror.
3. Keller has no fear or repect of the U.S. military, or what implications his actions may have on their safety and ability to prosecution the War on Terror.
4. Keller has no respect for anybody's privacy, other than his own.
I can just hear his defense of the where they live story now. It's in the public's interest, and it's not really a secret. The terrorists would to have known where they all live, right?
Do you suppose there's a Secret Service agent anywhere in the country who wouldn't read this story and say their job just got a little bit tougher, too?




